|
Central Bible College
TH-223 - Theology
II
COURSE
SYLLABUS
David Arnett
Office Phone: 833-2551 (Ex.
1150)
Cell Phone: 224-5325
(emergencies)
Office: Welch
134
E-mail: DArnett@cbcag.edu
Office
Hours: 1:00
- 3:00 p.m.
(anytime by e-mail)
Professor
For over 28 years,
David
Arnett served churches in
Missouri,
New
Mexico,
Illinois and
Wisconsin. He filled the roles of
evangelist, youth pastor, minister of Christian education, Christian
school administrator, church planter, senior pastor (for 22 years),
and business owner. He
has ministered in several foreign countries. He is currently planting
Grace Assembly of God in
Rogersville,
MIssouri (for more go to www.DavidArnett.com or www.graceassemblyrogersville.com
).
San Juan College; B.A.,
Central Bible College; M.A., Assemblies of God Theological Seminary;
New Mexico State University School Graduate School; Western Illinois
University; Trinity Evangelical Divinity School; D.Min. (candidate),
Assemblies of God Theological Seminary. He is in his ninth year of
teaching at Central
Bible
College (1992-95,
2000-current).
Mission
Statement
Central
Bible
College has been established
for the purpose of training ministers and missionaries.
Central
Bible
College is an Assemblies of God
institution of higher learning having a Bible-centered curriculum
designed to educate and train ministers, missionaries, and Christian
workers to serve the Lord Jesus Christ in and through the local
church.
Course
Description
The Doctrines of Man,
Sin, and Christ. This
course covers the person and offices of Christ, his atoning work,
and his humiliation and exaltation. The doctrine of man covers
the origin, nature, and original state of man, our covenant
relationship to God, the Fall, and free agency. The doctrine of sin covers
the nature of sin, theodicy, and man’s fallen nature and its moral,
physical, and intellectual effects. Prerequisite: TH
213.
Course
Textbooks
Grudem,
Wayne. 1995. Systematic
Theology.
Grand
Rapids,
Mich.:
Zondervan Publishing House.
The
Holy Bible. Any
version.
The
New International Version will be used for memorization and in class
notes.
Course
Objectives
As a result of his or
her experiences in this course of study, the student should be able
to:
1. Show that he or she
has mastered the information related to the Bible-based doctrines
dealing with Anthropology, Hamartiology, Christology, and the
Atonement.
2. Delineate the divine
purpose in the creation of humanity.
3. Present a case for
the complimentary roles of males and
females.
4. Explain the essential
nature of humans.
5. Describe the origin
and consequences of sin.
6. Discuss the concept
of “inherited guilt.”
7. Explain the
“unpardonable sin.”
8. Present a Bible-based
response to the major controversies in the early church concerning
the Person of Jesus Christ.
9. Explain how Christ
earned
salvation for fallen
humans through His atoning sacrifice.
10. Quote key verses
dealing with the doctrines of humanity, sin, Christ and the atoning
sacrifice.
11. Project an attitude
of gratitude in light of the costly price Christ paid for
salvation.
12. Manifest the
acceptance of the Biblical doctrines of Anthropology, Hamartiology,
Christology, and Atonement by preaching and teaching them as
opportunities of Christian service
permit.
Course
Requirements
The requirements for
TH-223 (C) Theology II are as follows:
1.
Exam #1 will be on or
before Friday, February 03
— It will cover all
class notes under unit one, the reading of pages 437-489 in Wayne
Grudem’s Systematic Theology (your textbook), and the
memorization of Genesis 1:26-27 in the New International
Version. Memorization
will be tested by means of a fill-in-the-blank section (study accordingly).
The exam will have
questions inquiring whether the textbook and the additional 100
pages have been read or not. The memorization will take
some doing. It is recommended that the student write the verses on 3
x 5 cards and drill them whenever there is a spare minute. This is
not
an
open book test. Any
form of cheating or dishonesty on tests will be grounds for
receiving an "F" for the course.
2.
Exam #2 will be on or before
Friday, March 03
— It will cover all
class notes under unit 2, the reading of pages 490-525 in Wayne
Grudem’s Systematic Theology (your textbook), and the
memorization of 1 John 1:8-10 in the New International Version.
Memorization will be tested by means of a fill-in-the-blank section (study
accordingly).
The exam will have
questions inquiring whether the textbook and the additional 100
pages have been read or not. The memorization will take
some doing. It is recommended that the student write the verses on 3
x 5 cards and drill them whenever there is a spare minute. This is not an open book test.
Any form of cheating or
dishonesty on tests will be grounds for receiving an "F" for the
course.
3.
Exam #3 will be on or before
Friday, March
31
— It will cover all
class notes through under unit 3, the reading of pages 527-567 &
608-633 in Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology (your
textbook), and the memorization of Colossians 1:15-20 in the New
International Version.
Memorization will be tested by means of a
fill-in-the-blank
section (study accordingly).
The exam will have
questions inquiring whether the textbook and the additional 100
pages have been read or not. The memorization will
take some doing. It is
recommended that the student write the verses on 3 x 5 cards and
drill them whenever there is a spare minute. This is not an open book test.
Any form of cheating or
dishonesty on tests will be grounds for receiving an "F" for the
course.
4.
1,000 word essay will be due
on or before Friday, April 14
— The student must
submit a 1,000 word essay—with an introduction, a thesis statement,
main points and a conclusion—on one of the following topics (or a
relevant topic approved by the professor). In preparing his or her
essay the student should consult the Bible and a minimum of five
additional
theological journals, books,
tapes or videos dealing with the topic. All direct quotes should be
documented properly. A
properly prepared bibliography should be included.
Any form of PLAGIARISM,
CHEATING OR DISHONESTY in assignments or tests will be grounds for
receiving an F for the course.
This includes copying in total or extensive undocumented
portions of online papers or other
sources. The
essay should be e-mailed to the
professor.
1.
Imago
Dei
2.
Dichotomy vs. Trichotomy
vs. Monism
3.
Origin of the
Soul
4.
Death
5.
Theodicy
6.
Inherited Sin /
Guilt
7.
Degrees of
Sin
8.
“Unpardonable
Sin”
9.
The
Covenants
10.
The Impeccability of
Christ
11.
Logos
12.
Virgin
Birth
13.
The
Incarnation
14.
The Kenosis
Theory
15. The Chalcedonian
Definition
16. The Hypostatic
Union
17. Monothelitism
18.
Propitiation
19. The Ransom
Theory
20. Redemption
21. The “Abandonment” of
Christ
22. The “Descent” of
Christ
23. The
Resurrection
24. The
Ascension
5.
Final Exam will be on or
before Monday, May 01
— It will cover all
class notes under unit 4, the reading of pages 568-607 in Wayne
Grudem’s Systematic Theology (your textbook), and the
memorization of 1 John 2:1-2 in the New International Version. Memorization will be tested
by means of a matching section (study accordingly). Memorization will be tested
by means of a fill-in-the-blank section (study accordingly).
The exam will have
questions inquiring whether the textbook has been read or
not. The memorization will take
some doing. It is recommended that the student write the verses on 3
x 5 cards and drill them whenever there is a spare minute. This is not an open book test.
Any form of cheating or
dishonesty on tests will be grounds for receiving an "F" for the
course.
GRADING
POLICIES
The course grade will be
determined by the student’s successful completion of the assignments and will be
calculated as follows.
•
20% = Exam #1
•
20% = Exam #2
•
20% = Exam #3
•
20% = 1,000 Word Essay
•
20% = Exam #4
Resources
for Reading Report and Additional Study
Inclusion
does not necessarily indicate agreement with everything in the
book.
Bennett,
Dennis and Rita Bennett.
1987. Trinity
of Man.
Green
Forest,
Ark.: New
Leaf Press.
Berkhof,
L. 1978. Systematic
Theology. Grand
Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans Publishing Company, pages
179-412.
Berkouwer,
G. C. 1952. Man: The Image of God
(Studies in
Dogmatics).
Grand
Rapids,
Mich.:
Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Berkouwer,
G. C. 1965. The Work of Christ
(Studies in Dogmatics).
Grand
Rapids,
Mich.:
Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Berkouwer,
G. C. 1971. Sin (Studies in
Dogmatics).
Grand
Rapids,
Mich.:
Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Boettner,
Loraine. 1985. Studies in
Theology.
Phillipsburg, NJ: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing,
pages 140-351.
Buswell,
James Oliver, 1962.
A Systematic Theology of the Christian Religion. Grand Rapids, Mich.:
Zondervan Publishing House, pages 221-429 of part 2 and pages 17-215
of part 3.
Calvin,
John. 1990. Institutes of the
Christian Religion.
Grand
Rapids,
Mich.:
Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Crabtree,
Charles T. 1982. This I Believe.
Springfield,
Mo.:
Gospel Publishing House.
Enns,
Paul P. 1989. Moody Handbook of
Theology.
Chicago:
Moody Press.
Erickson,
Millard J. 1983, 1984,
1985. Christian
Theology. Grand
Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, pages
453-841.
Geisler,
Norman L. 2004. Systematic Theology: Sin
Salvation.
Minneapolis,
Minn.:
Bethany House Publishers.
Grider,
J. Kenneth. 1994. A Wesleyan-Holiness
Theology. Kansas
City, Mo. Beacon Hill Press, pages 230-349.
Hodge,
Charles. 1999. Systematic Theology. Vol. 2.
Peabody,
Mass.:
Hendrickson Publishers.
Horton,
Stanley M. 1994.
Systematic Theology: A Pentecostal Perspective.
Springfield,
Mo.: Logion Press.
Lewis,
Gordon R. and Bruce A. Demarest. 1996. Integrative
Theology.
Grand
Rapids,
Mich.:
Zondervan Publishing House.
Miley,
John. 1989. Systematic
Theology.
Peabody,
Mass.:
Hendrickson Publishers.
Moore,
Frank. Coffee Shop
Theology: Translating Doctrinal Jargon into Everyday Life. Kansas City, Mo. Beacon Hill
Press, pages 81-138.
Nelson,
P.C. 1981. Bible
Doctrines.
Springfield,
Mo.:
Gospel Publishing House, pages 17-30.
Pearlman,
Myer. 1937. Knowing the Doctrines of
the Bible.
Springfield,
Mo.:
Gospel Publishing House, pages 95-216.
Purkiser,
W. T. 1978. Exploring Our Christian
Faith.
Revised.
Kansas
City,
Mo.
Beacon
Hill
Press.
Rice,
John R. 1954. When a
Christian Sins.
Chicago:
Moody Press.
Shank,
Robert. 1989. Elect in the Son.
Minneapolis,
Minn.: Bethany House
Publishers.
Shank,
Robert. 1989. Life in the Son. 2nd ed.
Minneapolis,
Minn.: Bethany House
Publishers.
Strong,
Augustus H. 1907. Systematic
Theology.
Valley
Forge,
Penn.:
Judson Press, 465-809.
Swindoll,
Charles R. and Roy B. Zuck, eds. 2003. Understanding Christian
Theology.
Nashville, Tenn.: Nelson Reference, pages 291-390 and
643-802.
Thiessen,
Henry C. 1949. Introductory Lectures in
Systematic Theology.
Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans Publishing Company, pages
213-340.
Walvoord,
John F. 1974. Jesus
Christ Our Lord.
Chicago:
Moody Press.
Wiley,
H. Orton. 1946. Introduction to Christian
Theology.
Kansas
City,
Mo.
Beacon
Hill
Williams,
Ernest S. 1953. Systematic
Theology. Vol.
2.
Springfield,
Mo.:
Gospel Publishing House.
Williams,
J. Rodman. 1996. Renewal
Theology. Vol.
1. Grand Rapids, Mich.:
Zondervan Publishing Company, pages 197-414.
Internet
Resources
Inclusion
does not necessarily indicate agreement with everything in the
book.
College of
Saint
Benedict/
Saint
John's
University -
http://www.csbsju.edu/library/internet/theosyst.html
Charles
G. Finney - http://www.ccel.org/f/finney/theology/
Charles
Hodge - http://www.dabar.org/Theology/Hodge/TableofContents/Content_Intro.htm
An
Introduction to Christian Belief: A Layman’s Guide -
http://www.bible.org/docs/theology/overview/toc.htm
Doctrine
of Jesus Christ - http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/theology/christology.asp
Doctrine
of Man - http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/theology/man.asp
Classic
Reformation Theology - http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/classicarticles.html
Religion-online.org. Full texts by recognized
religious scholars - http://www.religion-online.org/
Virgin
birth -
http://www.athmaprakashini.com/virginbirth3.htm
Can a
Christian Deny the Virgin Birth? -
http://www.lifeway.com/lwc/article_main_page/0,1703,A%253D155919%2526M%253D150019,00.html
Understanding
the Incarnation of Christ - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/8449/hypo2.html
Incarnation
and Humanity Of Christ - http://www.refuge-outreach.org/christianity/doctrine/christ/incarnation.html
Wesley
Center Online
- http://wesley.nnu.edu/index.htm
J.
Rodman Williams’ Charismatic Pentecostal Theology -
http://home.regent.edu/rodmwil/
Pentecostal
Resources - http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~kbanner/pentec.html
==========================
Theology II
Class Notes
J.
David
Arnett
Anthropology
Anthropos –
“man”
Logos – “word”
Anthropology is the study of man
or humanity
Anthropology
In the realm of science,
anthropology deals with the problems of primitive man, the
distinction of races, their geographical distribution and the
factors which enter into man's development and
progress.
Anthropology
In theology, it deals with
humanity’s
Creation
Purpose
Essential
nature
Distinctive roles (male/
female)
Moral and religious
character
The
Origin of Humanity
Origins of
Humanity
Apart from revelation, humans
only have vague theories as to their origins.
Most are based
on:
Pantheistic
Mythologies
Materialistic
Theories
Materialistic
Theories
Evolution
Evolution is fascinating because
it attempts to answer one of the most basic human questions: Where
did life, and human beings, come from?
The theory of evolution proposes
that life and humans arose through a natural process [Naturalism or
Materialism].
“A very large number of people do
not believe this, which is something that keeps evolution in the
news.”
Theory of
Evolution
Billions of years ago, according
to the theory of evolution, chemicals randomly organized themselves
into a self-replicating molecule.
This spark of life was the seed
of every living thing we see today (as well as those we no longer
see, like dinosaurs).
That simplest life form, through
the processes of mutation and natural selection, has been shaped
into every living species on the planet.
Theory of Natural
Selection
Mutations are a random and
constant process.
As mutations occur, natural
selection decides which mutations will live on and which ones will
die out.
If the mutation is harmful, the
mutated organism has a much decreased chance of surviving and
reproducing.
If the mutation is beneficial,
the mutated organism survives to reproduce, and the mutation gets
passed on to its offspring.
In this way, natural selection
guides the evolutionary process to incorporate only the good
mutations into the species, and expunge the bad mutations.
Macro vs. Micro
Evolution
Macroevolution refers to
evolutionary change at or above the level of
species.
Microevolution refers to any
evolutionary change below the level of
species.
Punctuated vs.
Gradual
Punctuated equilibrium theory
proposes that once species have originated, and adapted to the new
ecological niches in which they find themselves, they tend to stay
pretty much as they are for the rest of their existence.
Phyletic gradualism suggests that
species continue to adapt to new challenges over the course of their
history.
Holes in the
Theory
Three questions the theory of
evolution struggles answer:
How could the first living cell
arise spontaneously to get evolution started?
How does evolution add
information to a genome to create progressively more complicated
organisms?
How is evolution able to bring
about drastic changes so quickly?
Macro vs. Micro
Evolution
Macroevolution refers to
evolutionary change at or above the level of species. “Goo to you by way of the
zoo.”
Microevolution refers to any
evolutionary change below the level of
species.
What does the Bible
say?
“So God created the great
creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which
the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird
according to its kind.
And God saw that it was good” (Gen.
1:21).
“And
God
said, ‘Let the land produce living
creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move
along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.’ And
it was so” (Gen. 1:24).
What does the Bible
say?
“So God created the great
creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which
the water teems, according to their species, and every winged bird
according to its species.
And God saw that it was good” (Gen.
1:21).
“And
God
said, ‘Let the land produce living
creatures according to their species: livestock, creatures that move
along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its species.’
And it was so” (Gen. 1:24).
Micro – yes ~ Macro –
no
“Neither geology, nor morphology,
nor embryology furnish any proof of the change of one species into
another. … Thus we conclude that there
is no proof of the evolutionary origin of species and that species
are immutable” (Thiessen, 218).
What about Theistic
evolution?
The theistic evolutionist holds a
position somewhat between that of the atheistic evolutionist and the
creationist.
He believes that God created the
materials of our universe and then guided
and
superintended the process by which
all life has evolved from the
simplest one-celled form up to the sophisticated forms of
today.
“Evolution was God’s method of
bringing about the present development, though originally the
materials were created by God” (Baxter, 1971, p.
159).
Darwin a Theistic
Evolutionist
Charles Darwin was a theistic
evolutionist for he could never quite get rid of the idea of God.
He wrote in his first edition of
the Origin, “There is a grandeur in this view of life that the
creator breathed into several forms, or into one, the breath of
life, and these have gone cycling on, giving rise to forms most
beautiful and most wonderful to behold” (Origin of Species, 1956).
Is there a problem with
T.E.?
“For those who hold to the Bible
as the word of God, theistic evolution should not be a viable
option. The Bible says,
‘Know that the LORD is God. It is he who made us...’ (Psalm
100:3). The Scriptures
state that God created.
God said, ‘Let there be...’ and there
was. The Scriptures
speak of the creative word of God. When
God
speaks; it occurs. He said,' Let
there be’ and it was so.
It does not say, ‘Let there be a slow development through an
evolutionary process’” (Christian Apologetics & Research
Ministry at www.carm.org).
“Although atheistic evolutionists
disbelieve the teaching of the Bible, the theistic evolutionists
impugn the character of God when they explain the story of creation
symbolically; we have in the Scriptures the only reasonable
explanation of the origin of man.
Even if evolution could prove its
doctrine of the survival of the fittest, it cannot account for the
arrival of the first [life form]” (Thiessen,
218).
In the Bible we are told that God
‘created’ man and that He ‘made’ and ‘formed’ him out of the dust of
the ground.
As to his body, man was made of
the dust of the ground.
As to his immaterial nature, he
was made by the inbreathing of God.
This conception of the origin of
man gives him a dignity of being and a position of responsibility
that no other theory does, and lays the foundations for a sane
system of ethics and redemption” (Thiessen,
218-219).
Attempts to Reconcile Science and
Genesis 1
The Day-Age
Theory
“The days of Genesis 1 are really
long periods of time, which correspond to the major periods of
evolutionary geological history” (Institute for Creation Research @
http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-081.htm).
Attempts to Reconcile Science and
|